Psychology and Ethical Epistemology

نویسندگان

چکیده

We examine a hitherto unstudied debate, turning on the epistemology of value judgements, between Ashʿarīs and Baṣran Muʿtazilīs late eleventh twelfth centuries. Al-Ghazālī al-Rāzī countered Muʿtazilī ethical realism, here defended by al-Malāḥimī, developing an emotive subjectivism underpinned increasingly sophisticated psychological accounts motivation. Value they maintained, arise not from knowledge some attributes acts themselves, but subjective inclinations, which are often elusive because can be unconscious or indirect. also argue against widespread notion that espoused anti-rationalist ethics, we show were only rationalists, more innovative side in this debate.
 Keywords: al-Ghazālī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Avicenna, Ashʿarism, Muʿtazilism, Theory, Moral Realism Anti-Realism, Emotivism, Psychology, Rationalism, Intellect (ʿaql), Estimation (wahm), Disposition (ṭabʿ), Widely-Accepted Premises (mashhūra), Reputable (maḥmūda)

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Shareability : The Social Psychology of Epistemology * JENNIFER

Psychologists and cognitive scientists interested in the nature of internol representotions of humon knowledge often use observable regularities or structures to infer what the innate constraints on those representations must be like. It is possible, however, that certain structures might come about only when a group of people share a knowledge domain. Furthermore, it is possible that there ore...

متن کامل

Sanford C. Goldberg the Psychology and Epistemology of Self-knowledge

In this paper I argue, first, that the most influential (and perhaps only acceptable) account of the epistemology of self-knowledge, developed and defended at great length in Wright (1989b) and (1989c) (among other places), leaves unanswered a question about the psychology of self-knowledge; second, that without an answer to this question about the psychology of self-knowledge, the epistemic ac...

متن کامل

Psychology, epistemology, and skepticism in Hume's argument about induction

Do we yet understand Hume's project in his main argument about induction in Treatise I.iii.6? Is the argument skeptical? Is it even so much as epistemological, skeptical or otherwise? Or is it merely psychological? Although the literature has made much progress on these questions, we have not reached a full understanding of Hume's position. I hope to fill in some missing pieces of the interpret...

متن کامل

Formal Epistemology and the New Paradigm Psychology of Reasoning

This position paper advocates combining formal epistemology and the new paradigm psychology of reasoning in the studies of conditionals and reasoning with uncertainty. The new paradigm psychology of reasoning is characterized by the use of probability theory as a rationality framework instead of classical logic, used by more traditional approaches to the psychology of reasoning. This paper pres...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0806-198X']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5617/jais.9573